Corps Commanders Label Free Speech as Digital Terrorism
Declaration of Corps Commander Conference
The declaration of the Corps Commander Conference has taken many by surprise. The imagery is powerful: corps commanders sitting with their heads bowed. The media has relayed a critical message from this conference. The corps commanders have decided to take decisive action against those involved in what they term “digital terrorism.” This is not about recent acts of terrorism, such as the killing of the daily martyrdom of brave soldiers. Instead, this digital terrorism refers to those perpetrating terrorism on social media. The freedom of speech in Pakistan is digital terrorism.
Addressing Digital Terrorism
The Corps Commander Conference has taken a strict stance on this issue. They have declared that individuals involved in digital terrorism will be rigorously investigated by various departments and agencies in Pakistan. These individuals will face severe consequences. The Pakistani state is poised towards the worst situation. But the powerful establishment is committed to eliminate the most popular leader of Pakistan Imran Khan and his party PTI.
The Reaction to Digital Terrorism
The term “digital terrorism” is being coined for the first time. Unfortunately, in Pakistan, this new term might make the country a laughing stock globally. The weaponization of the term “terrorism” to curb freedom of speech is alarming. In Pakistan, religion and national security have been used as tools as per convenience. Now, digital terrorism is being added to that list. Terrorism cases are being registered against people as needed. This trend is escalating and now affects common Pakistanis. If an ordinary Pakistani posts something on social media, they will face consequences. Unlike other developed countries, where criticism of the government or state decisions is accepted, in Pakistan, it is being labeled as digital terrorism.
The Broader Implications
The declaration shows a disturbing priority of the state. While actual terrorism is happening on the borders with Afghanistan, where soldiers, officers, and the public are getting martyred, the focus is on digital terrorism. India repeatedly claims responsibility for attacks, yet the state’s priority is to target common Pakistanis online. This misalignment of focus is troubling.
Nawaz Sharif’s Stance on Overseas Pakistanis
Nawaz Sharif, meanwhile, has targeted overseas Pakistanis. From his comfortable residence in Murree, he met Irfan Siddiqui and made a bold statement. According to Nawaz Sharif, overseas Pakistanis are defaming Pakistan for political motives. He claims they are harming Pakistan for their own benefit. This accusation is surprising, given Nawaz Sharif’s own controversial history. He has always been perceived as harming Pakistan’s interests, yet he now accuses overseas Pakistanis of the same.
The Synchronization of Narratives
There seems to be a troubling synchronization in the narratives. On one hand, the Corps Commander Conference labels common Pakistanis as digital terrorists. On the other, Nawaz Sharif accuses overseas Pakistanis of being enemies of the state. This leaves a narrow margin for dissent or criticism. The middle class, active on social media, is branded as digital terrorists, and overseas Pakistanis are labeled as enemies. This paints a bleak picture for freedom of speech in Pakistan.
The PTI Rally Incident
In Islamabad, despite court permissions, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) was not allowed to hold a rally. The NOC was first issued, then canceled. Containers were seized, and attendees were harassed. This incident highlights the suppression of political expression and assembly. PTI workers expressed deep grief and anger over the cancellation. The authorities’ actions have demoralized the supporters, as they see no clear path to holding rallies or assemblies.
Shireen Mazari’s Revelations
Shireen Mazari has broken her silence after a long period. In a revealing interview, she discussed the torture and persecution she faced, which forced her to leave Pakistan Tehreek Insaf. She recounted how a message was sent to her through her daughter, threatening to ruin her if she did not leave politics. Mazari highlighted the establishment’s underestimation of Imran Khan, comparing him to Nawaz Sharif and Asif Zardari. She revealed how she was removed from meetings by General Bajwa, but Imran Khan would include her again.
Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmed Khan’s Case
Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmed Khan, former Chief Justice of Lahore High Court, is facing renewed scrutiny. A fake letter was spread on social media, maligning his reputation. This follows a pattern of targeting justices, as seen previously with Justice Babar Sattar. The aim appears to be to discredit and harass justices who stand for law and justice.
The Military Establishment’s Grip on Pakistan: A Struggle Against Democracy
Pakistan stands at a crossroads. The political climate is charged, the public is restless, and democracy seems to be under siege. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, led by Imran Khan, finds itself in the eye of the storm, battling an establishment that appears determined to suppress its voice. On one hand, the military establishment obstructs PTI’s efforts to hold public rallies. On the other, it allegedly manipulates the judiciary to issue rulings against Imran Khan. This scenario paints a grim picture of a nation where might often overshadow the rule of law.
Suppression of PTI’s Public Rallies
Public rallies are a cornerstone of democratic expression. They allow political parties to engage directly with the electorate, share their visions, and mobilize support. However, the PTI’s attempts to hold such gatherings have faced significant roadblocks. The military establishment, wielding considerable influence, has reportedly stifled these efforts. This suppression is not just an attack on a political party; it’s an affront to democratic principles. It sends a clear message that dissenting voices will be silenced, and public discourse will be tightly controlled.
Manipulating the Judiciary
A robust judiciary is vital for any democracy. It ensures that laws are upheld and justice is served without fear or favor. Yet, in Pakistan, there are alarming reports of the military establishment’s interference in judicial matters. Judges, tasked with upholding the rule of law, allegedly face harassment and blackmail. Private moments are recorded, and these recordings are used as leverage to influence judicial decisions. This practice not only undermines the judiciary’s independence but also erodes public trust in the legal system. When judges cannot operate freely, justice is compromised, and the very fabric of democracy is weakened.
The Rule of Might Over the Rule of Law
The principle of “might is right” appears to overshadow the rule of law in Pakistan. This ideology champions power and force over legal and ethical standards. For the military establishment, maintaining control seems to take precedence over upholding democratic values. This approach fosters a climate of fear and compliance, where those who dare to challenge the status quo are swiftly dealt with. It is a dangerous precedent, suggesting that authority and influence can override constitutional principles and human rights.
Pakistan: An Open Jail
Living in Pakistan today feels like being in an open jail. The fear of reprisal stifles free speech and open criticism. The establishment’s actions against democracy are evident, yet few dare to speak out. Journalists, activists, and ordinary citizens know that criticizing the military establishment can lead to severe consequences. This environment of intimidation restricts freedom of expression and stymies political debate. It creates a society where people are afraid to voice their opinions, thereby weakening the democratic process.
Public Support for Imran Khan
Despite the establishment’s efforts, public support for Imran Khan remains strong. The former Prime Minister of Pakistan resonates with many Pakistanis who see him as a symbol of change and hope. His popularity poses a significant challenge to the establishment. By opposing Imran Khan, the military establishment is effectively opposing the public’s will. This dynamic fuels further unrest and dissatisfaction, as people feel their democratic choices are being subverted.
Conclusion
Pakistan’s current political landscape is a testament to the enduring struggle between authoritarian control and democratic ideals. The Corps Commander Conference’s declaration on digital terrorism and Nawaz Sharif’s accusations against overseas Pakistanis, the narrative is one of suppression and control. The military establishment’s attempts to suppress PTI’s rallies, manipulate the judiciary, and intimidate dissenters reveal a broader agenda to maintain power at all costs. Yet, the public’s unwavering support for Imran Khan suggests that the fight for democracy is far from over. In this battle, the rule of law and the voices of the people must prevail over the rule of might. Only then can Pakistan truly move towards a future where democracy is not just a concept but a lived reality for all its citizens.